PostsNews

SQE1 pass rate falls to record 41% low

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

13

Ouch

Online exam
The percentage of students passing the first part of the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE1) has fallen to a record low.

According to the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s latest statistical report, published today, only 41% of candidates sitting SQE1 in July achieved a passing mark. This represents a sharp drop from the 56% pass rate recorded in January and breaks the previous record low of 44% set in July last year.

Credit: SRA

While the overall pass rate of 41% includes both first-time and re-sit candidates (across Function Legal Knowledge 1 and 2), first-time sitters fared slightly better, with 46% achieving a pass.

The SRA explained that there is no fixed pass mark for SQE1. Instead, each paper is assessed independently to account for differences in difficulty, with the pass mark adjusted slightly downwards if a paper is found to be harder than intended.

The regulator also highlighted the unusually high number of re-sit candidates in this sitting — 19% of the July 2025 cohort were re-sitters, the highest proportion recorded to date. Unsurprisingly, these candidates tended to perform worse than first-time sitters, a trend seen across both SQE1 and SQE2 as well as in other professional exams.

The record low pass rate comes just a week after the SRA released an explainer defending the use of single best answer multiple-choice questions (MCQs) on SQE1, stating that it “does not test simple recall” but rather assesses aspiring lawyers’ ability to apply legal knowledge in a practical way.

The SQE Hub: Your ultimate resource for all things SQE

13 Comments

July25 Sqe Survivor

Just passed this exam and averaged in the 420s/500.

Yes, I did put a lot of work in but I was 50 marks above passing on each flk, this is a huge margin and in reality I would have had to severely mess up to fail.

It is an unpopular opinion but if you put in the hours and are competent then there is no reason you can’t pass this exam. Just like other professions, to keep standards high, there needs to be some barrier to entry.

No one in my sponsored class failed, in fact they all passed comfortably.

If people spent as much time revising for this exam as they do moaning, perhaps they would have more success.

If anything, it should be made harder. Bring on SQE2!

Reply Report comment
(21)(85)

Anonymous

Rage baiting in the Legal Cheek comment section is crazy work!

Reply Report comment
(73)(2)

July25 SQE Survivor

Not rage bait.

This is my experience and of course the majority will disagree but the majority fail.

Not my fault if you didn’t make the cut

Reply Report comment
(5)(43)

British law students are soft

LOL, we’ve reached the stage where any opinion deviating from the consensus of “SQE being worse than death” is automatically labeled as rage baiting.

Reply Report comment
(2)(1)

Lol

“It should be made harder” is just rage bait at this point.

Reply Report comment
(33)(2)

B.W.

This is such a bizarre thing to comment. It is very easy for those of us who have passed to sit on a pedestal and preach, but it’s outrageous of you to imply that people are simply not working hard enough but are instead complaining. Especially ironic that you’ve posted such a comment under the alias ‘SQE survivor’.

The exam does not make sense considering the actual skills and work required as a solicitor (competent research and legal
application, rather than factual recall)

Contrary to the ‘SQE survivor’s’ post – I’d say to anyone worried about the exam… complain all you like, get it out of your system, rely on your support network, and do your best on the day. No one can ask anymore of you.

Reply Report comment
(12)(1)

Law School tutor

Well done for passing, but I’d say the real criticism of SQE1 is that however hard they make it, the prep courses for it are not actually particularly good training or preparation for the legal work you’ll be doing. They’re simply crammer courses for MCQ exams. The LPC, for all its faults – such as each provider writing its own exams – was an excellent training course for the job of being a solicitor. Many firms have already remarked that their SQE trainees don’t really know as much about practice as their LPC trainees did. Clue’s in the name I guess.

Certainly I agree there need to be barriers to entry, a notion the SRA appear to have struggled with in their reforming campaign, but the job of law schools is not simply to get people through the profession’s exams. It’s also to get them ready for practice. The SQE courses on offer don’t do that – and it shows, in new trainees.

Reply Report comment
(9)(0)

Amy

There is your answer. Sponsored class. Most people don’t have that luxury.

Reply Report comment
(1)(0)

Anonymous

I managed to pass too as a sponsored student, as did 90% of my sponsored class, but I think it’s important to acknowledge the privileged position we are in, and how that might mean we downplay some of the pitfalls of the exam. I agree with you that it is definitely passable, but the SRA still have plenty of work to do to make it as clear-cut and put people who work extremely hard to pass the exam in the best position possible to succeed.

I don’t think most people complain about the difficulty, I think they complain about the lack of clarity provided by the SRA, considering the considerable amounts of money (especially non-sponsored, potentially working takers) are spending on course providers, mocks and the exam itself.

The lack of a clear and detailed specification causes providers to second-guess themselves in relation to the difficulty of their own mocks and the content they discuss in detail on their prep courses. The SRA mocks provided on the SRA website are considerably easier than the actual exam, which, to me, doesn’t make much sense. If I were self-funding the exam, I would be extremely put off knowing that the providers themselves are not 100% sure on the details of the exam, due to such a vague specification.

The SRA still haven’t released the provider-specific pass rates, so people are spending thousands on a prep course, working extremely hard, only to show up on exam day, and realise that the actual SQE questions are outside the scope of what their provider has taught them.

The SQE1 is definitely passable, and I don’t believe the difficulty of the exam is a problem, but it is catered to such a select group as of now (sponsored, non-working students) that I don’t see how it is increasing access to the profession.

Reply Report comment
(23)(3)

Ab

Completely agree. I have spent 12k on a course that does not prepare me for the exam, it is not the rigour of the exam, it is the students getting ripped of by training providers not being able to adequately prepare them. But the training providers seem to have little gudidance from the SRA and instead of welcoming improvment, the SRA seem to be very defensive and slow to publish anything tangible. Then you look at their record of punishing trainees for trivial matters. Begs the question do I even want to be regulated by them anyway. Any other trainee thought the same?

Reply Report comment
(4)(0)

Good

Good. The process is meant to sort out the wheat from the chaff. Or at least, sort out the wheat and some of the chaff from the rest of the chaff after the woke crowd dumbed the exams down.

Reply Report comment
(6)(25)

John Smith

I passed SQE1 first time. All it took was :
– Abusing stimulants
– 40+ hours of studying a week (On top of working as a trainee at an international firm)
– Caring about nothing else for the prep period (To the point that I was buying pre cooked chicken to save time)

I even developed temporary tinnitus during the last few weeks of my prep.

Tbf, passing made it all worth it!

The lesson, to pass, prepare to have no life.

Reply Report comment
(5)(0)

Annoymous

I think its also the length of time the exam takes as well as staring at a computer screen for that long

Reply Report comment
(6)(0)

Join the conversation

Related Stories

news SQE Hub

LPC pass rates tumble to 42% as SQE takes over

Lowest in five years

1 day ago
7
Hour glass and calendar
news SQE Hub

SQE provider pass rates must be released ‘as soon as possible’, says interim super-regulator boss

SRA faces criticism over delayed data

5 days ago
9
news SQE Hub

Exclusive: Panic and confusion as over 230 SQE students mistakenly told exam slots are cancelled

Kaplan apologises

6 days ago
12