Young lawyers face burnout as legal sector’s long hours culture bites, report finds

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

21

LawCare calls for urgent change


Young lawyers are facing the highest risk of burnout and the lowest levels of wellbeing across the profession, according to new research.

The Life in the Law 2025 report by charity LawCare, based on survey responses from more than 1,500 people working in the legal sector, found that those aged 26–35 scored lowest for mental wellbeing and highest for burnout. Overall, nearly 60% of lawyers reported poor mental wellbeing, while half said they experienced anxiety often, very often or all of the time in the past year.

The findings highlight the profession’s entrenched culture of overwork. Almost eight in ten respondents (78.7%) said they regularly put in hours beyond their contracts, with nearly one in ten working more than 21 extra hours each week.

This follows Legal Cheek’s exclusive research on the average start and finish times of lawyers at over 100 leading firms. The data revealed that while some lawyers’ schedules broadly align with a standard 9–5 day, others — particularly at the highest-paying firm — often see their working days stretch to 12+ hours.

The 2026 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

LawCare researchers also heard from many lawyers who are struggling. One law firm partner admitted, “Work has nearly broken me physically and mentally.” A junior barrister echoed this sentiment, saying, “It is unsustainable. My work is slowly killing me.”

The survey also found widespread concerns over workplace culture. Nearly a fifth of respondents (19.5%) said they had experienced bullying, harassment or discrimination in the past 12 months, most often from line managers or supervisors. Levels of psychological safety, or how safe people feel to raise concerns and ideas, also fell in the lower half of the scale.

Retention is a growing concern, with more than half of respondents (56.2%) saying they could see themselves leaving their current workplace within the next five years, and almost a third (32.1%) considering leaving the profession altogether.

LawCare wants urgent change. Its recommendations include tackling heavy workloads, giving managers proper training, embedding flexible working and reforming legal education so newcomers are ready for the realities of the job.

“The legal sector is at a turning point,” the report states. “Our research highlights that people in the sector are facing significant strain, raising urgent questions about its long-term sustainability. Unless decisive action is taken now, the profession risks losing people, further erosion of mental health and wellbeing and reduced public trust and confidence.”

Struggling with the stress of work? Contact LawCare via its helpline or live chat.

21 Comments

Scounsel

Barristers work the longest, especially in publicly funded work.

In court every day.

Prep every evening and most weekends.

Longest of all is in-house barristers for defence firms.

In court all day, prep all evening and the prospect of being called out to a Police station at 3am before going to court the next morning.

Alistair

If u prep all evening then let another solicitor do the 3am! Dont be greedy for fees

Roderick Armitage

Might add that in my years as Legal Director of a large listed FTSE company, not only were the fees of so many of the central London firms frequently extortionate, the work itself was often extremely shoddy. They aren’t really legal firms but simply money machines. I would add that those who are overworked have a solution, just work to the hours set, not any longer. Just walk out the door when you reach those hours. It’s the right thing to do, and for the client.

Anonymous

“just work to the hours set”

An excellent suggestion if you want to lose your job within about six months.

Him wot no stuf

Doesn’t work.

It will be your fault that you are working too slowly when the work doesn’t get done.

CrimePerson

Stop moaning. This is an article about proper lawyers not Crimmy Bazzas.

Deadlock Daniels

We need regulation and enforcement. Nobody should be legally allowed to bill over 1,600 hours in a year. Make it a sanctionable offence to emply a fee earner that exceeds this. It would result in better quality of work, client care, and wellbeing in the industry. Pay would of course take a hit across the board, but that would be a necessary evil.

Eck Whitty

Are you happy to drop starting NQ salaries by 50% too?

Deadlock Daniels

For the firms where 2100, 2200+ billable is par for the course, yes up to 50% might be realistic.

Then the reductions in salary would be on a sliding scale down to the firms which only require c. 1500, 1600 hours, that would be unaffected by the new requirements.

Bubbles Wardrobeson

Pull up your big pants and get a grip. Wimpy millennials.

Amy

Boomers have ruined it all for us. Young people nowdays have additional challenges with the inflated costs of everything.

LPC tutor

This was an issue when I was in practice in the 1990s – lots of lawyers of my generation left because of it, it’s nothing to do with wimpy millennials.
When I was 5 and a half years qualified, I still liked law but didn’t want to devote such a huge proportion of my waking hours to commercial lit and all its grinding demands, so I took a sideways move into legal training at what was then the College of Law now ULaw. Fantastically brainy colleagues, fun, not bad pay outside London, for the hours (9-6). It’s interesting to see what my LSF cohort are doing – I’d say fewer than half stayed in private practice. Because of the hours.

Gregg

I am in neither group, but objective data shows millennials work more hours than boomers. Just saying.

Observant Partner

This is true

Handling people problems is tiring and will affect your mind and mental health, coz you’re absorbing their problems

And don’t expect any sleep if you’re having a trial tomorrow, you’ll wake up all night till the trial is over

One of my friend is already crazy, but on the outside, she seems fine. But she’s always on medication, on her rant and media posts, you can hint imbalance and madness, but her friends keep quiet

With technology, handphone and laptop, the jobs are increasing and clients are incessantly asking questions around the clock

As if the lawyers aren’t human, they’ll only stop after the lawyers are dead or cease practicing…

Alistair

Why your client contract is shit that u not specifed no reply between 1800 and 900? Contact me outside those hours request responses within those times fee 400 percent more. Get a grip!

Bigtime

Stop complaining about your privilege and remember your clerks fees need paying.

Hannah

Interesting

Adrian

How about paying overtime? That would provide a strong incentive to hire the correct number of people.

Close to 100 years ago, Franklin Delano Roosevelt worked out that the easiest way to address the polarisation of work hours was to make employers pay time and a half for anything more than the standard 40 hour week.

In one of my previous jobs as a production manager, the boss was adamant that I needed to hire casuals when we were paying too much overtime to workshop employees on an hourly wage. Conversely, for the salaried office staff, he would say wev ust needed to find a way to get it done. I note that some workshop staff were getting a higher base hourly and overtime in comparison to the office staff.

Annual salaries and vague reasonable hours clauses create a perverse incentive for firms to underhire.

Mr B Fawlty, esq.

This just in: profession willing to pay 25 year old NQs approximately 4.8x the national average salary before bonus requires you to work more hours than average.

It’s very simple – if you can’t stand the heat, step out of the bloody kitchen to make room for those who can. Before someone decries me as an out of touch boomer, I’m one of those 25 year old NQs getting paid a silly amount of money for what I do. I’m also not convinced it’s a “wimpy Gen Z” problem in the abstract, but actually largely down to firms pretending they’re nice places that value you as an individual at the recruitment stage, and people being surprised when that turns out to be bullshit.

Before the angry mob chase me down with their pitchforks – I’m aware that the above doesn’t engage with the deplorable position that legal aid practitioners have been left in. They get the absolute worst of the bargain, with time demands that often rival Biglaw and lamentably poor compensation. It is a stain on our country’s legal system and a national shame. They have absolutely nothing but my support and respect, and they deserve much better. They are not the ones to blame for the fact that they are leaving private practice in droves.

Chiamaka

I suggest more employment. Employ more paralegal type of lawyers to help with the workload. Employ people from diverse groups.

Bobby Burns

Burn out and take some serious sick leave cash and then move on.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Calls to lawyer wellbeing charity at all-time high

Over one third mentioned stress and anxiety, says LawCare

Feb 17 2025 1:05pm