Hogan Lovells keeps 16 of 24 autumn qualifying trainees

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

14

One NQ on fixed term contract


Hogan Lovells has retained 16 of its 24 trainee solicitors qualifying this autumn, including one on a fixed-term contract.

This gives the global law firm a retention rate of either 67% or 63%, depending on how the numbers are interpreted. Twenty-three final seat trainees applied for roles.

HL said 10 newly qualified solicitors will join its corporate and finance team (including the fixed-term hire), while four will qualify into global regulatory and intellectual property. Two will join the litigation, arbitration and employment practice.

The Legal Cheek Firms Most List 2026 shows that HL typically recruits around 50 trainees each year, split across two intakes. Starting salaries are £56,000, rising to £140,000 upon qualification.

Trainee retention rates round-up 🤝

(scroll right if using 📱)

Firm Trainees Retained Retention Rate NQ Destinations
Wedlake Bell 8 8 100% 2 to insolvency; 1 each to commercial disputes, construction, corporate, tax, IP/commercial, and private client
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer 31 29 94% Undisclosed
Irwin Mitchell 53 48 91% 14 to business services group; 12 to medical negligence; 9 to court of protection & public law & human rights; 8 to private client group; 4 to personal injury; 1 to general counsel
RPC 18 16 89% 6 to insurance; 6 to disputes (3 IP/tech, 2 commercial litigation, 1 media); 4 to corporate & commercial
Watson Farley & Williams 18 16 89% 5 to asset finance; 4 to project finance; 2 to corporate; 1 to debt capital markets; 2 to disputes and 1 to finance in Dubai; 1 to disputes in Bangkok
Mishcon de Reya 30 26 87% Undisclosed
Clifford Chance 57 49 86% Undisclosed
Macfarlanes 28 24 86% Undisclosed
Baker McKenzie 20 17 85% 4 to disputes; 3 to employment; 2 each to corporate M&A and corporate energy & infrastructure; 1 each to corporate finance, corporate private equity, intellectual property, and financial services regulatory; 2 to antitrust & competition
Lewis Silkin 6 5 83% 2 to employment; 1 each to IP, corporate, and digital, creative & commerce
Linklaters 40 33 83% Undisclosed
Bird & Bird 20 15 75% 5 to commercial; 5 to IP; 2 to disputes; 2 to corporate; 1 to employment
Pinsent Masons 71 52 73% 19 to finance & projects; 13 to transactional; 10 to property; 10 to risk advisory
A&O Shearman 54 37 69% Undisclosed
Hogan Lovells 24 16 (1 on FTC) 67%/63% 9 (10 including FTC) to corporate & finance; 4 to global regulatory & IP; 2 to litigation, arbitration & employment
Withers 14 9 65% Undisclosed

14 Comments

oof

anyone got the gossip – that seems…low?

Anon

Same story as a lot of others, simply too many trainees. Numerous firms are quietly reducing intakes because of this issue

?

But that’s not the case at the other firms based on the stats? Genuine q.

Suzanne

AI

wonderwhy

Lol – wonder why Freshfields has not published their rates also.

they usually publish their retention rates a month or so before the relevant qualification round. rumours are the retention rates are dog shit …. i.e. 60% to 70% so they be hiding dat

Melina

I’ve been following Freshfields upcoming trainee cohort on LinkedIn, as I follow a vlogger who’s a trainee there (now qualified) who I actually enjoyed watching, her content was subtle but enjoyable.

I’m surprised to see she moved to another firm on qualification. Then had a quick look on LinkedIn, and have seen a few others from the same cohort have moved firms – and it appears that others have finished their TC but not qualified into the firm.

Will be interesting to see what’s really happened.

LinkedIn Guy

If it’s Libbie Miles, she’s moved to Jones Day apparently according to her LinkedIn

Have been told

Gateley too. Or so I’ve heard

Slllll

The just rolled out 3 AI tools. Can’t blame them😭😭

Not submitting my application anymore

Anon

Exactly. HL keeps just 63% of its trainees so clearly humans are optional. Every week there’s a new law firm press release about AI, and voilà, retention tanks. Meanwhile, profits keep climbing, proving some firms would rather hire a robot than nurture human talent. The good ones are shrinking trainee intakes so they can keep NQs.

Vance

Oh dear oh dear oh dear…
Dreadful numbers from these guys

Anon

Wondering if the collapse of the NQ market might be a function of AI because the overall legal market and profits are still growing. This is where the impact of AI will be seen first, shrinking numbers of entry roles.

Ex-Reed Smith

63% might be low for a transatlantic fimr like HL, but it’s standard or even on the higher side for some others (Reed Smith have consistently let at least 30% or more of their trainees go for the last 2.5 years).

US firms don’t have the same qualms as English firms about letting trainees go – it’s all part of the employment at-will culture of the US. Think hard before chasing that shiny NQ dollar at a US firm because it only applies to those who are around long enough to see it.

Lateral Enjoyer

Lol, “US firms” Hogan Lovells and Reed Smith.

Join the conversation