‘I’m a paralegal, but I’m treated like the firm’s personal assistant’

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

9

Given minimal legal work


In our latest Career Conundrum, a paralegal shares that she feels more like a personal assistant — but with a potential training contract on the horizon, should she stick it out?

“Hello Legal Cheek. I joined a firm about 8 months ago as a conveyancing paralegal with the ‘promise’ of a training contract subject to performance. Unfortunately, my experience hasn’t been great so far as I feel more like the firm PA than a paralegal (no disrespect to PAs, of course, it’s just not what I signed up for). My exposure to legal work has been pretty minimal with most of my time spent answering phones, arranging meetings, fetching coffees/organising the lunch run and doing the ‘life admin’ for the partners. I worry that the firm might be stringing me along regarding the training contract and I don’t really know what to do. Please help!”

If you have a career conundrum, email us at tips@legalcheek.com.

The 2026 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

9 Comments

Junior Lawyer

It feels quite disingenuous that they would lure you in with the promise of a TC! I think maybe the only thing you can do is have an honest discussion with your supervisor about your performance – perhaps showing some initiative, even if it feels uncomfortable, and asking for some work would help?

MC partner

I think what people need to understand is that this is simply par for the course when you’re working at a junior level in a firm. I did my fare share of coffee rounds and look where I am now!

Whilst I appreciate your frustration, the best think to do is to keep your nose down and do the work – there’s no use complaining about it.

US > MC

*fair.

Anonymous

“look where I am now”. Yes, a law student, or some low level rubbish associate in some rubbish firm. You are not a MC partner.

Someone from somehwhere

It depends the type of firm. If you’re at a high street firm they’re probably stringing you along or at best it will be years before they actually give you one. Like someone said above, have an honest discussion with your supervisor and speak to other paralegal’s/junior lawyers at the firm to get their experience.

Career Coach

I sympathise with your experience. Unfortunately it is not uncommon, particularly in smaller organisations.

Have you tried really putting yourself out there – e.g. offering your time to support on certain legal matters, remind colleagues of your background and professional interests, set up meetings with your colleagues to learn more about legal practice etc? This is often a good tool to wake people up to your willingness to learn and work. It will also give you more insight into the firm’s intentions and whether it is best that you move on to pastures new.

If your experience continues with no clear prospect of change, start planning your exit into a new role that is more suitable.

It is often the case that opportunities don’t land in our laps and we mostly need to seek out opportunities. It might feel that you are “annoying” or a “teacher’s pet”, but it is very commendable to drive your own career and interests.

Good luck with your career!

Anna

I would leave the firm and go somewhere else. Ignore all the above,

Anonymous

The SQE now allows you to qualify as a paralegal, you can provide so much value and qualify at the same time as being a paralegal, rather than waiting around for a TC. You are in many ways in a better position as trainees are a cosy and much of their time is written off. Paralegals generate fees and you can use that to show your value. Get signed off for your current firm for the 8 months, and then part time fund the SQE at a different and reputable firm as a paralegal if this is the area for you and you don’t want to waste time moving seats etc.

Career Coach

While this is technically true, don’t put all your eggs in this basket. It is still advisable from a careers perspective to follow a traditional qualification path (if you’re circumstances and luck gets you there). Training contracts are very specifically designed to develop you as a solicitor and it also involves wider training on other types of skill that, simply for HR reasons, aren’t offered to paralegals. In addition, salary trajectory is better if you follow a traditional path.

But don’t get me wrong. Paralegals do incredible work and sometimes the lines are blurred between what they do vs. what associates do. The line is even more blurry for in-house roles.

Qualify using paralegal experience by all means. But make sure to consider if this is the best option for you. This pathway of qualification may sadly be prone to some prejudice where you may not be seen in the same light as an NQ who qualified by way of training contract. I’ve heard of instances where qualified solicitors are kept in their paralegal position simply because there aren’t NQ positions for them, including because these are reserved or preferred for those who did TC.

Join the conversation