US Supreme Court legend Ruth Bader Ginsburg now has her own Lady Hale spider pin

By on

‘Notorious RBG’ thanks lawyers at 2 Bedford Row for arachnid fashion item

Lady Hale and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Image credit: UK Supreme Court and Supreme Court of the United States

Barristers at a London chambers are celebrating after their gift of a Lady Hale-style spider pin found favour with US legal icon Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The US Supreme Court Justice has written to fans at 2 Bedford Row to thank them for the present, which was inspired by the spider brooch that Hale famously sports in court.

In the letter, published by the set’s Shauna Ritchie, Ginsburg said:

“I will wear the spider pin with pride and appreciation for Brenda Hale, the great Lady who sparked its creation”.

It was addressed to “The Women of 2 Bedford Row”, who arranged for the pin to be presented to Ginsburg by outgoing head of chambers William Clegg QC at a recent meeting.

Lady Hale’s penchant for pins was first spotted by Legal Cheek, but the spidery version she selected when delivering judgment in the Boris Johnson prorogation case went mega-viral.

Lawyers and politics geeks rushed to copy the eight-legged accessory, with former cabinet minister Amber Rudd spotted wearing a tribute in Parliament last month.

Speaking to Legal Cheek this morning, Ritchie explained how the pin went global:

“Our Head of Chambers for over 25 years, Bill Clegg QC, recently stepped down from that role and new heads Brian Altman QC and Jim Sturman QC took over. At chambers drinks to celebrate that momentous occasion I asked Bill what he was going to do with all the extra free time and he explained that he was off to Washington DC that very week where he would be meeting Ruth Bader Ginsburg [as pictured below]”.

Bill Clegg QC and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Image credit: @wordbiscuit

Ritchie, a criminal specialist at the London set, went on:

“After he politely declined the offer of a number of us to accompany him on the trip, we decided it would be a nice token of our esteem to send her a Lady Hale inspired spider pin. I, like many women at the bar, had purchased one after her momentous Brexit judgment and, together with a letter explaining that we were celebrating the first 100 years of women in law and wanted to celebrate our role models, off it went to Washington. Her kind letter in reply arrived yesterday.”

Ginsburg, one of the US Supreme Court’s last liberal justices and a proud feminist, has become something of a legal icon in recent years. A 2015 book, Notorious RBG, chronicles how the 86 year old has “won the internet”, with fans lapping up social-media friendly quotes such as:

People ask me sometimes, when โ€” when do you think it will it be enough? When will there be enough women on the court? And my answer is when there are nine.

Earlier this year, a mini-Ginsburg appeared in the new Lego movie, while a non-Lego documentary about her life and times picked up two Oscar nominations last year.

The American answer to Lady Hale even has a fashion statement of her own: a collection of collars, from a gold “majority collar” to a sparkly “dissent collar”.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub






So she would be what, the Kelly Rowlands of the Supreme Court?



Is this legal news?


Dave Barrister

Yes but it is uplifting and nice and doesn’t feature NQ Pay or misfeasance in office, so you are forgiven for thinking it falls outside of LC’s normal coverage.


One magic circle firm to rule them off

Lady Hale looks like Golum



She looks like your mum?


Not Amused

2019 – “wooo look how cool and edgy it is to politicise the judiciary”

2020 onwards – “Booo the other side are using the now politicised judiciary in a way I dislike”

The complete lack of basic foresight by the elites in our society is staggering.


Mr Pooey Bum QC

The fatal presuppositions in your argument: assuming your average neo-Marxist/liberal types can apply logic and rationality to the political sphere.

Don’t waste your time on them.


Most Amused

I’m fairly sure that Viscount Rothermere’s paper publicly maligning Supreme Court judges in 2016 in response to a ruling that complicated his own political ends is a far more apt example of the elites in our society politicising the judiciary than, say, a bunch of mostly Uni students making some cheap merch based on a funny brooch.

I’m also not sure how something that is at worst some low-level banter could possibly be considered a step towards politicising the judiciary (given that the way in which Judges are appointed and must behave remains exactly the same as it was before).

However, the right to be a bloviating pearl-clutching ham-face is, fortunately for some, generally protected.



What were those political ends?



How is attacking judicial decisions politicising the judiciary?

Your comment makes no sense.

Itโ€™s full of spite though: keeping up the good work of patronising, selfish middle-class remainers everywhere.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘


John Curran

Absolute cringe.


Comments are closed.

Related Stories